A propos de moi

Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in file site
Let's look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type has the advantage of having a server on idc, so it does not have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.

However, you should pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.

Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not just a Webhard, it is a company.

It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.

Link hard solutions have emerged good intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had an internet site or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work which used to run the site.

OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage in addition to the Webhard's original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the solution.

The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which may be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.

It is now necessary for Soho to establish a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.

최신 웹하드 Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Internet service that allows you to download files over the Internet at a fixed monthly cost. Therefore the usage of web hard is becoming common.

But it's not just lately that this concept came out, and it's true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, many people used it, and there were many office workers who didn't sign up for it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.

The biggest background of this phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it.

In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), which is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.

NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly reduce the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is very innovative since it supports uploading files automagically. It's a really good feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.

Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations as the basic webhard included in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Subsequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it's a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very useful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.

Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll have a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the right one in line with the reality and needs.